Prioritized findings
Three changes before sending more people into onboarding.
High priority · Contradicted expectation
“One plan for everything you train” implies broader coordination than the current plan picker provides.
Homepage evidence: The hero promises “One plan for everything you train” and “12 sports in one truly periodized plan.” A comparison section says strength and cardio are coordinated in the same week.
Founder clarification: Users pick one of 12 plan types. Coordination happens inside that choice; Hybrid combines strength and running, while Triathlon combines swim, bike, and run. Users may log other training, but it is not part of the selected plan's coordination.
Risk: A cyclist who also lifts may expect arbitrary multi-sport coordination, choose Cycling, and only discover after setup that the promise applies to predefined combined plans.
Change: State the selection rule before signup and repeat it above the plan picker: “Choose one plan. Hybrid and Triathlon coordinate multiple disciplines; other training can still be logged separately.”
Acceptance check: Five first-time visitors can explain which sessions will be coordinated for Cycling, Hybrid, and Triathlon before creating an account.
Medium priority · Observed
The “12 sports” label mixes sports, goals, and exam preparation into one mental model.
Observed: The listed plans include sports such as running and cycling, strength goals such as hypertrophy and powerlifting, combined formats such as Hybrid and HYROX, “speed and power,” and entrance-test preparation.
Onboarding risk: A new user has to decode the product's taxonomy before choosing a plan. Someone training for football speed or a police entrance test may not recognize their goal as one of “12 sports.”
Change: Ask “What are you preparing for?” first, then group choices under Single sport, Combined disciplines, Strength goal, Team-sport speed, and Entrance exam. Show which sessions each choice coordinates.
Acceptance check: Users with three representative goals—running plus lifting, football speed, and a police test—choose the intended plan without using a back button or regenerating immediately.
Medium priority · Unknown
The public page cannot show whether onboarding explains why an adjustment happened.
Observed: The homepage says the plan adjusts every morning to sleep and fatigue. In the public thread, the founder says one bad night only softens intensity, several days of signals are needed before volume is trimmed, and the app shows what changed and why.
Missing evidence: The public page does not show an example adjustment screen or the exact explanation a new user sees. The signed-in onboarding and daily check-in were outside this review's scope.
Bounded check: Add one annotated screenshot showing “signal → exact change → unchanged parts of the week.” Then test whether first-time users describe the plan as stable rather than continuously rewritten.
Resolution rule: Keep the daily-adjustment claim if the UI names the signal, the bounded change, and what remains fixed. Rewrite it if users interpret every check-in as a new plan.